Lower Botanic Gardens, Belfast: The Generic Quantitative Risk Assessment

The Generic Quantitative Risk Assessment report described implementation of a site soil survey and consequent contamination remediation action for the Lower Botanic Gardens (Belfast, UK). The exploratory site investigation was undertaken between October-December 2022, and comprised excavation of 28 soil samples and subsequent laboratory analysis for a common contaminant suite. Results confirmed contamination distributions linked to historical industry. Risk remediation actions were proposed for features with different levels of soil exposure.

Read full article

The Generic Quantitative Risk Assessment of existing soil contamination at the Lower Botanic Gardens, Belfast, was designed to identify areas of soil contamination, assess risk potential and pollutant linkages, and highlight areas on the Lower Botanic Gardens site that contain existing soil contamination that may require further investigation or remediation in accordance with UK government guidance (Environment Agency, 2021). This was achieved through a review of the Preliminary Risk Assessment (Newell, 2022) and a tailored exploratory site investigation and laboratory analysis undertaken during October-November 2022.

The exploratory site investigation was designed by Armstrong (2022) and comprised a non-targeted, intrusive/disturbed spot sampling design. Here, 22 sampling points were established on an offset herringbone grid across the site (Figure 1). Trial pits were excavated to 0.5m using a micro-digger, and samples were taken at 0.3m (6 samples) and 0.5m (22 samples) and sent to a UKAS-accredited laboratory for analysis. A second sampling exercise was undertaken in November to replace three samples that had been lost in transit to the laboratory.

The site investigation confirmed a ~30cm layer of clean topsoil under the turfed surface and a subsequent layer of heterogenous industrial infill, as reported in Kirk McClure Morton (2003). The results from the site investigation confirmed the presence of metal and organic contamination stemming from the historical industrial fill, and thus confirmed the potential for human health hazards associated with inhalation and ingestion of site substrates. These observations were then used to refine the original conceptual site model developed in the Preliminary Risk Assessment (Newell, 2022). After confirming potential risks, each proposed feature on the Lower Botanic Gardens development was assessed according to user interaction with contaminated soils. Open spaces covered with hardstanding/imported materials/extensive vegetation were deemed to have little risk to site users due to the physical barrier to soils. Alternately, exposed soil and allotment-type spaces, including play areas and areas for cultivating plants, present increased risk of soil contact and may require remediation measures. A remediation strategy was designed for the first proposed site feature: the Research Gardens. Prior to use, this feature should have appropriate signage and fencing to limit public use. Further investigations may be required when developing other areas of the site.

Trial pit no.Depth / mIGR.X.IGR.YLatitudeLongitude
TP010.3, 0.533384637204754.57911-5.93048
TP020.533387837204754.5791-5.92999
TP030.533392637204954.57911-5.92925
TP040.533384437200954.57877-5.93053
TP050.533387437201254.57879-5.93007
TP060.533390437201754.57883-5.9296
TP070.3, 0.533393537201154.57876-5.92912
TP080.533385637197954.5785-5.93036
TP090.333388537198554.57854-5.92991
TP100.3, 0.533391637198654.57855-5.92943
TP110.533395437199254.57859-5.92884
TP120.3, 0.533387237191754.57794-5.93014
TP130.533385937194854.57822-5.93033
TP140.533388837195454.57827-5.92988
TP150.533391937195754.57828-5.9294
TP160.3, 0.533395037196554.57835-5.92891
TP170.533390237192654.57801-5.92967
TP180.533393237192754.57801-5.92921
TP190.533396337193554.57807-5.92873
TP200.3, 0.533387537189254.57771-5.93011
TP210.533390537189554.57773-5.92964
TP220.533393137190654.57782-5.92923

References

Armstrong, E. 2022. MEng student paper. Assessing the Risks posed by Land Contamination at Lower Botanic Gardens, Belfast. Queen’s University Belfast. Unpublished. (Accessed 21 May 2022)

Environment Agency (2021) Guidance: LCRM: Stage 1 risk assessment. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/land-contamination-risk-management-lcrm/lcrm-stage-1- risk-assessment#tier-1-preliminary-risk-assessment (Accessed 22 November 2021).

Kirk McClure Morton (2003) Contaminated Land Survey Final Report. Queen’s University Belfast. Ref: 5460.09/Reports.

Nathanail, C. P., McCaffrey, C., Gillett, A. G., Ogden, R., & Nathanail, J. (2015). The LQM/CIEH S4ULs for human health risk assessment. Land Quality Press.

Newell (2022) Preliminary Risk Assessment Lower Botanic Gardens, Belfast [Internal report].

Newell (2023) Phase 2 Site Investigation Report: Exploratory investigation including Generic Quantitative Risk Assessment – Lower Botanic Gardens, Belfast [Internal report]

UPSURGE

UPSURGE bridges the gap between the existing knowledge base on Nature Based Solutions and their step-by-step practical implementation for regenerative development of cities focusing on air pollution alleviation and climate neutrality.

Our main aim is to reroute cities and fast forward their regenerative transition benefiting from the potential of Nature Based Solutions (NBS).

UPSURGE is the response to the challenges faced by cities in their efforts to decrease the impacts of urban existence on climate change, mitigate air pollution and its health effects and reduce climate change stressors.

To help European cities enter the regenerative transition pathway, UPSURGE will provide an EU Urban Regenerative Lighthouse to serve as a reference framework and a reference network to accelerate, transfer and upscale the use of NBS and mainstream them into the agenda of urban policies through co-creation and co-design processes with citizens and other stakeholders.

UPSURGE will provide fit for problem NBS together with supportive digital, and governance solutions for urban space regeneration deployed and tested in 5 real-life demo cities in Europe.

Project details

  • Project title: City-centered approach to catalyze nature-based solutions through the EU Regenerative Urban Lighthouse for pollution alleviation and regenerative development.
  • Funding scheme: The project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 under grant agreement No. 101003818
  • Duration: 48 months (1 September 2021- 31 August 2025)
  • Project coordinator: E-ZAVOD, ZAVOD ZA PROJEKTNO SVETOVANJE, RAZISKOVANJE IN RAZVOJ CELOVITIH RESITEV, Slovenia
  • Project website: https://www.upsurge-project.eu

Jennifer Newell

Jennifer Newell is a research student at Queen’s University Belfast, investigating the risks and benefits of urban agroecology.

Siobhan Cox

Dr Siobhan Cox is a Senior Lecturer in Environmental and Civil Engineering at Queen’s University Belfast. Her research interests include risk assessment of contaminated sites including human health risk assessment, the use of bioaccessibility testing, and the environmental impacts of construction processes and materials.